I have been reading the extremely graphic action in
Book XX as Achilles finally gets into the field and unleashes his terrible
wrath on the Trojans after an inconclusive exchange with Aeneas. Throughout the
ages, the Iliad has been the vade mecum of many a warrior or military
strategist, from Alexander up to the more recent participants of the Iraq
‘event’ of 2003 and possibly even Afghanistan with its Operation ‘Achilles’
against Taliban enclaves. It is probably a fruitless exercise to try to decide
whether Homer (whoever he was individually or collectively over time) was pro
or anti war (I suspect the best answer would be- both) – but the death/carnage
scenes impress me with two things, one is their graphically detailed, almost
anatomically surgical presentation – the other is their literary function in
the work as a whole. I was struck by this when I first read sections of the
epic many years ago, I suspect I found it quite exhilarating and exciting and
didn’t delve too much into the futility and horror of war tropes that Homer
also masterfully hints at. What is the detail for I wondered? Perhaps it is for
the vicarious pleasure of the readers or descendants of the slayers revelling
in the destruction of the loser and following Achilles vaunts with a hearty
cheer like football fans when their side scores a goal? Or for the descendants
of the victims who wanted closure in knowing exactly how their hero and the
founder of their city/deme died? Maybe it acted as a mnemonic so that the
bard/s could recall the section more easily with stand out gory details like
this. The first to fall is Ophition – compared with the slaughters that follow,
a relatively clean felling:
‘First he killed Iphition son of Otrynteus, a leader of many
people whom a naiad nymph had borne to Otrynteus waster of cities, in the
district [dêmos] of Hyde under the snowy heights of Mount
Tmolos. Achilles struck him full on the head as he was coming on towards him,
and split it clean in two; whereon he fell heavily to the ground and Achilles
vaunted over him saying, "You be low, son of Otrynteus, mighty hero; your
death is here, but your lineage is on the Gygaean lake where your father's
estate lies, by Hyllos, rich in fish, and the eddying waters of Hermos.’
Note the vaunt over the fallen dead. It’s not quite urinating on
the body of the defeated but here we see the ritualized taunting of the slain
enemy, contrasting the aristocrat’s high estate in life, his lineage and wealth
with his split corpse lying on the dust at Achilles sandaled feet. This
taunting is an intrinsic feature of Homeric combat and confrontation scenes –
the verbal squaring up (see Aeneas before as well as Hector) before and after
combat.
It is found in a lot of epic military literature – I have been
reading a Japanese medieval war chronicle (The Taiheiki 13-14th C
AD) and in the course of the many battle encounters, great warriors have their
speeches and taunts before they launch into action to become slayer and slain.
Meanwhile back in the Iliad, Demeleon and others bite the dust:
‘Achilles killed Demoleon, a valiant man of war and son to
Antenor. He struck him on the temple through his bronze-cheeked helmet. The
helmet did not stay the spear, but it went right on, crushing the bone so that
the brain inside was shed in all directions, and his lust of fighting was ended.’
‘Then he struck Hippodamas in the midriff as he was springing down
from his chariot in front of him, and trying to escape. He breathed his last,
bellowing like a bull bellows when young men are dragging him to offer him in
sacrifice to the King of Helike,
and the heart of the earth-shaker is glad; even so did he bellow as he lay
dying.’
The detail ratchets up a notch, Homer literally follows the
trajectory of the death blow through to its gory conclusion and we also have a
vivid image in the Hippodamas’ death scene of the intense and very realistic
suffering of a stomach/chest wound – the horror as the fallen warrior dies and
the extreme agony and suffering expressed by the simile of the sacrificial Bull
bellowing in fear, suffering and outraged agony at his fate. Achilles is just
getting into his stride now and his bloodlust is well and truly up:
‘Achilles then went in pursuit of Polydoros son of Priam, whom his
father had always forbidden to fight because he was the youngest of his sons,
the one he loved best, and the fastest runner. He, in his folly and showing off
the excellence [aretê] of his speed, was rushing about among front ranks until
he lost his life, for Achilles struck him in the middle of the back as he
was darting past him: he struck him just at the golden fastenings of his belt
and where the two pieces of the double breastplate overlapped. The point of
the spear pierced him through and came out by the navel, whereon he fell
groaning on to his knees and a cloud of darkness overshadowed him as he sank
holding his entrails in his hands.’
The detail extends to a technical knowledge of the armour and I
think it’s these little touches that prove the lie to those commentators who
try to picture Homer as an armchair warrior. The detail, wherever it has come
from (either Homer or embellishments as the long epic developed and was
improved as it was handed down from generation to generation of bard) shows an
uncommon intimacy with the equipment that the warrior went into the field with.
A lesser poet could have got away with a more imaginative gloss but this touch
makes the description extremely realistic and conveys a layer of authenticity
rarely found in other epic poetry. In the next round of attacks, Achilles fells
Drypos and Demoukhos, Laogonos and Dardonos one after another, almost as an
afterthought..very swift and with minimum fuss – ‘clean kills’ as the modern terminology
would have it.
‘On this he struck Dryops with his spear, about the middle of his
neck, and he fell headlong at his feet. There he let him lie and stayed
Demoukhos son of Philetor, a man both brave and of great stature, by hitting
him on the knee with a spear; then he smote him with his sword and killed him.
After this he sprang on Laogonos and Dardanos,
sons of Bias, and threw them from their chariot, the one with a blow from a
thrown spear, while the other he cut down in hand-to-hand fight.’
And most movingly and tragically, the pitiful and pitiable death
of Tros – his name symbolic, prefiguring the merciless destruction of the city
of Troy, an act that was outside the scope of Iliad but a theme which Virgil
takes up with consummate artistry and empathy in his epic the Aeneid.
‘There was also Tros the son of Alastor - he came up to Achilles
and clasped his knees in the
hope that he would spare him and not kill him but let him go, because they were
both of the same age. Fool, he might have
known that he should not prevail with him, for the man was in no mood for pity
or forbearance but was in grim earnest. Therefore when Tros laid hold of his
knees and sought a hearing for his prayers, Achilles drove his sword into his
liver, and the liver came rolling out, while his bosom was all covered with the
black blood that welled from the wound. Thus did death close his eyes as he lay
lifeless.’
Moulios gets his head skewered; Deukalion is rendered
non-combatant by hamstringing the arm (if that’s the correct term) and then
promptly decapitated. Not only that but we have the fantastically gory image of
the marrow oozing out of the spinal column post-beheading. Wild stuff!! The
descriptions again show anatomical (black or red blood depending on where it
issued from) knowledge or at least field experience either first hand or from
men that had seen combat and could inform the workings of the epic as it was
created and later embellished.
I wonder if the epic (Mark 1 for arguments sake) started out fairly
heroic but relatively non gory and the ‘details’ were added by successive
generations of war-experienced audiences as they sought more vivid and
evocative detail with which to improve the telling and retelling of the epic as
it was sung at the wine-soaked hearth fires of great lords and warriors in
successive and increasingly war-like ages to come.
Prowess in battle and the recording of heroic acts is nothing new
or unique of course, but the point I am making in this post lies in Homer’s
(unique level of detail I would offer) attention to combat detail. I think it’s
unique to Homer but I may be wrong. If you know of any other epic that has a
similar level of detail and demonstrably not a distant ancestor of Homer – let
me know. As I have done earlier with the medieval Japanese war literature
(gunki monogatari), you may have to leave Europe to find it.
Hopefully I will recover from all this excitement and get back to
with some more commentary on XXI.
Euge!
No comments:
Post a Comment